Post by mistybbaktersfo on Jan 8, 2024 5:21:03 GMT -5
Google and are both located in the United States. In its judgment, the EU Court of Justice clarified that the transfer of personal data from the EU to the United States is subject to very strict conditions. If adequate protection of the personal data cannot be ensured the website must avoid transferring the personal data to the United States. and Google clearly fall within the scope of U.S.-related surveillance laws that allow targeting EU citizens. This is particularly important for politically exposed persons such as members and staff of the European Parliament.
The complaint therefore calls for a ban on such transfers that violate EU law must lead by example and comply with the law. This also applies to data transfers outside the EU. By using the services of a US provider, the European Email Marketing List Parliament allowed US authorities to access the data of its employees and members through deceptive banners and unclear messages. Furthermore the website’s banners are unclear and deceptive. These banners do not list all that are placed on the browser and force the user to accept them all. There is therefore no valid legal basis for the processing of data on the website and the placement based on user consent.
The information provided on the website is also misleading. Users were even faced with two different data protection notices containing different information on behalf of six MEPs. Neub joined six MEPs in support of their complaint to the European data protection watchdog. The original complaint was filed at the end of the year by women on behalf of other MEPs. The European Data Protection Supervisory Authority is a special data protection authority responsible for EU institutions and agencies. Direct access to court This is important for larger issues. Inspectors will now review other applications submitted and should make a decision on the matter in due course. Filing a complaint to a supervisor may also provide the opportunity to take proceedings directly to Europe's highest court.
The complaint therefore calls for a ban on such transfers that violate EU law must lead by example and comply with the law. This also applies to data transfers outside the EU. By using the services of a US provider, the European Email Marketing List Parliament allowed US authorities to access the data of its employees and members through deceptive banners and unclear messages. Furthermore the website’s banners are unclear and deceptive. These banners do not list all that are placed on the browser and force the user to accept them all. There is therefore no valid legal basis for the processing of data on the website and the placement based on user consent.
The information provided on the website is also misleading. Users were even faced with two different data protection notices containing different information on behalf of six MEPs. Neub joined six MEPs in support of their complaint to the European data protection watchdog. The original complaint was filed at the end of the year by women on behalf of other MEPs. The European Data Protection Supervisory Authority is a special data protection authority responsible for EU institutions and agencies. Direct access to court This is important for larger issues. Inspectors will now review other applications submitted and should make a decision on the matter in due course. Filing a complaint to a supervisor may also provide the opportunity to take proceedings directly to Europe's highest court.