Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:16:41 GMT -5
From his point of view, “the basis of this Agreement is to facilitate both the work of admitting cassation appeals by the corresponding Court, as well as the work of professionals in order to comply with the cassation technique requirements required by the appeal.” for admission."
This jurist is “very aware of the saturation of cases suffered by the First Chamber of the Supreme Court. During the year 2022, the matters under the jurisdiction of that Chamber rose to 10,280 and the matters in process at the end of that year to 21,036, with which I hope that if the Agreement facilitates the processing of resources that meet the legal requirements, they can be resolved within reasonable deadlines, that is, without diminishing the expectations of the parties, the aforementioned Agreement will be welcomed.”
For his part, Pablo Franquet, a partner in Procedural Fax Lists Law at Fieldfisher and an expert in cassation before the Supreme Court, highlights that “we are talking about mandatory recommendations so that the appeals raised are taken into account. This agreement of the Government Chamber that has just been announced is imperative to follow since it is published in the BOE in the coming days.”
In these formal aspects “they ask us cassation lawyers to summarize in a couple of pages what we are asking for , why it is requested, what the basis of the argument is and so on. In a couple of pages the Supreme Court magistrates can know if they are interested in it or if it goes to the discarded pile, that is substantial. They have taken the experience of the Constitutional Court and have continued. It is one more step than the Third Contentious Chamber took in its day, which will surely take that step later .”
This jurist is “very aware of the saturation of cases suffered by the First Chamber of the Supreme Court. During the year 2022, the matters under the jurisdiction of that Chamber rose to 10,280 and the matters in process at the end of that year to 21,036, with which I hope that if the Agreement facilitates the processing of resources that meet the legal requirements, they can be resolved within reasonable deadlines, that is, without diminishing the expectations of the parties, the aforementioned Agreement will be welcomed.”
For his part, Pablo Franquet, a partner in Procedural Fax Lists Law at Fieldfisher and an expert in cassation before the Supreme Court, highlights that “we are talking about mandatory recommendations so that the appeals raised are taken into account. This agreement of the Government Chamber that has just been announced is imperative to follow since it is published in the BOE in the coming days.”
In these formal aspects “they ask us cassation lawyers to summarize in a couple of pages what we are asking for , why it is requested, what the basis of the argument is and so on. In a couple of pages the Supreme Court magistrates can know if they are interested in it or if it goes to the discarded pile, that is substantial. They have taken the experience of the Constitutional Court and have continued. It is one more step than the Third Contentious Chamber took in its day, which will surely take that step later .”
