Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 5:10:17 GMT -5
This provision of the law states that they are entitled to exercise popular action and that, to do so, they will have the right to free legal assistance in the terms provided for in Law 1/1996, “any non-profit legal persons” that have Among its purposes is the protection of the environment or some of its elements, which are two years old and which carry out their activity in a territorial area affected by the administrative action or omission. The PACMA Political Party is a legal entity, it is non-profit and its statutes state that its objective is “the defense of animal rights.” The State's lawyer affirmed that PACMA is not a non-profit legal entity, but a political party that has a special and exclusive regime and that the parties are nourished by public and private resources, therefore.
it is evident that a party political is not included for the purposes of free legal aid.” PACMA has taken the declaration of the monterías as an Asset of Cultural Interest to the Supreme DJ USA Court. (Image: Extremadura Channel) The Supreme Court, in a ruling consulted by this newspaper, points out that “it is clear that political parties meet the conditions of being legal entities and not having a profit motive ,” taking into account that they are prohibited by law from developing commercial activities. He adds that the expression contained in Law 27/2006 of “anyone” has “a determined vocation to cover in a global and comprehensive manner all organizations that meet the established requirements,” not contemplating “exceptions or reservations.
If the fact of receiving some type of subsidies - the amount of which depends on their electoral results - were exclusive and "the exclusion of all political parties were indiscriminately denied, there would be an unacceptable effect of exclusion of minority parties that have not achieved significant electoral results and lack funds to promote the defense of their programmatic objectives,” the Supreme Court emphasizes. The High Court adds that "it is not possible to understand why, having attributed popular action in such a general manner to any personified social groups whose statutory objective is the defense and preservation of the environment, it is intended to deny such possibility, however, to "the political parties that have been established as a manifestation of the fundamental right of participation in public affairs (art. 23.1 CE) with the same protective purpose, and have made it the center of their action program .
